South Carolina Municipal Audit Tracker

Every municipality and county currently listed as delinquent on state-required financial audits — updated monthly from the SC State Treasurer's official lists.

As of the State Treasurer's most recent updates, 69 South Carolina municipalities and 3 counties have not submitted one or more required annual financial audits. That matters more now than it has in years: beginning July 1, 2025, the State Treasurer's Office resumed withholding state payments from municipalities with late audits under Proviso 98.9 of the state budget. The years-long grace period is over — towns on this list are seeing real money held back, from Local Government Fund distributions to local option sales tax revenue.

This page exists as a free public resource. City councils, finance staff, journalists, and residents can check whether their municipality is current, see how far behind it is, and understand exactly what state law requires. We refresh it monthly from the Treasurer's published lists.

Nothing on this page is a judgment of any town's staff. Most delinquent municipalities are small — many under 1,000 residents — and a missed audit usually reflects capacity, turnover, or auditor availability, not misconduct.

Methodology and as-of dates

  • Source: SC Office of the State Treasurer — Municipal Delinquent Audits and County Delinquent Audits.
  • Municipal list last updated by the Treasurer: July 24, 2026. County list: May 19, 2026. Retrieved: August 1, 2026.
  • Entity names and fiscal years are reproduced exactly as published. County assignments are added by Innovation Nexus for geographic context and are not part of the Treasurer's list.
  • A municipality may have submitted its audit after the Treasurer's last update; the official pages linked above are always the controlling record. (Example: the Town of Clio announced on July 1, 2026 that it has submitted all outstanding audits, though it still appears on the July 24 list.)

The current list

Delinquent municipalities: 69 (list updated July 24, 2026) · Delinquent counties: 3 (list updated May 19, 2026)

EntityTypeCounty*Fiscal years delinquentYears behind
Allendale CountyCountyFY251
Orangeburg CountyCountyFY251
Williamsburg CountyCountyFY24, FY252
AndrewsMunicipalityGeorgetown/WilliamsburgFY241
Atlantic BeachMunicipalityHorryFY10–FY134
BlacksburgMunicipalityCherokeeFY24, FY252
BonneauMunicipalityBerkeleyFY16–FY249
BurnettownMunicipalityAikenFY20–FY245
Calhoun FallsMunicipalityAbbevilleFY20–FY245
CampobelloMunicipalitySpartanburgFY17, FY182
Central PacoletMunicipalitySpartanburgFY16–FY249
ClioMunicipalityMarlboroFY12–FY165
CopeMunicipalityOrangeburgFY241
CordovaMunicipalityOrangeburgFY12, FY13, FY15–FY2412
CottagevilleMunicipalityColletonFY23, FY242
DuncanMunicipalitySpartanburgFY241
EhrhardtMunicipalityBambergFY23, FY242
ElloreeMunicipalityOrangeburgFY23, FY242
FairfaxMunicipalityAllendaleFY22–FY243
FurmanMunicipalityHamptonFY18–FY225
GiffordMunicipalityHamptonFY14–FY196
GovanMunicipalityBambergFY20–FY245
HildaMunicipalityBarnwellFY241
HodgesMunicipalityGreenwoodFY14–FY2411
Honea PathMunicipalityAnderson/AbbevilleFY251
IvaMunicipalityAndersonFY09, FY15, FY16, FY21–FY247
JacksonMunicipalityAikenFY20–FY245
JohnsonvilleMunicipalityFlorenceFY241
JonesvilleMunicipalityUnionFY251
LancasterMunicipalityLancasterFY23, FY242
LaneMunicipalityWilliamsburgFY23, FY242
LattaMunicipalityDillonFY23, FY242
LivingstonMunicipalityOrangeburgFY12–FY2413
LorisMunicipalityHorryFY17, FY19–FY214
MayesvilleMunicipalitySumterFY23–FY253
McCollMunicipalityMarlboroFY23, FY242
MonettaMunicipalityAiken/SaludaFY23, FY242
Mount CroghanMunicipalityChesterfieldFY21–FY244
NeesesMunicipalityOrangeburgFY22–FY243
NicholsMunicipalityMarionFY18, FY19, FY233
NorwayMunicipalityOrangeburgFY20–FY245
OlarMunicipalityBambergFY14, FY20–FY257
PamplicoMunicipalityFlorenceFY22–FY243
PaxvilleMunicipalityClarendonFY17–FY248
PeakMunicipalityNewberryFY10–FY2415
PelzerMunicipalityAndersonFY231
PinewoodMunicipalitySumterFY22–FY243
PomariaMunicipalityNewberryFY20–FY245
ReevesvilleMunicipalityDorchesterFY15–FY239
Ridge SpringMunicipalitySaludaFY241
RowesvilleMunicipalityOrangeburgFY17–FY248
RubyMunicipalityChesterfieldFY22–FY243
SalemMunicipalityOconeeFY15, FY162
SalleyMunicipalityAikenFY241
ScrantonMunicipalityFlorenceFY21–FY244
SilverstreetMunicipalityNewberryFY12–FY2413
SmoaksMunicipalityColletonFY18, FY19, FY22–FY245
South CongareeMunicipalityLexingtonFY241
SpringdaleMunicipalityLexingtonFY23, FY242
SpringfieldMunicipalityOrangeburgFY16–FY238
St. MatthewsMunicipalityCalhounFY19–FY246
StarrMunicipalityAndersonFY17–FY248
SycamoreMunicipalityAllendaleFY23, FY242
TimmonsvilleMunicipalityFlorenceFY251
TroyMunicipalityGreenwood/McCormickFY19–FY246
UlmerMunicipalityAllendaleFY21–FY244
VanceMunicipalityOrangeburgFY23, FY242
WagenerMunicipalityAikenFY23, FY242
WardMunicipalitySaludaFY08–FY2417
West UnionMunicipalityOconeeFY22–FY254
WilliamsMunicipalityColletonFY241
WoodfordMunicipalityOrangeburgFY17–FY248

* County column added by Innovation Nexus for geographic context; the Treasurer's list publishes entity names and fiscal years only. Note: the Town of Clio announced on July 1, 2026 (WPDE) that it has submitted all outstanding audits; the Treasurer's municipal list (last updated July 24, 2026) still shows Clio.

Quick stats: 28 of the 69 municipalities are five or more fiscal years behind. Ward (Saluda County) has the longest backlog at 17 years. In the Pee Dee, four Florence County towns — Johnsonville, Pamplico, Scranton, and Timmonsville — appear on the list, along with Latta, Nichols, McColl, Lane, and Williamsburg County itself.

What the law actually says

The 13-month deadline

South Carolina municipalities must provide for an annual audit (or, for the smallest towns, a compilation) of their financial statements under S.C. Code § 5-7-240, and municipalities with a court system must include a Uniform Supplemental Schedule of court fines and assessments under S.C. Code § 14-1-208. Under the state budget's enforcement proviso, the audited financial statements required under § 14-1-208 must reach the State Treasurer within thirteen months of the end of the municipality's fiscal year. For a June 30 fiscal year end, that means the following July 30.

The Treasurer's Office states plainly that it is not permitted to accept extensions for municipalities. Counties are different: under § 4-9-150 a county may request a single extension of up to 90 days, signed by the council chair before the filing deadline.

The penalty: Proviso 98.9 (FY2025-26 Appropriations Act, H.4300)

The operative language, from the Treasurer's own posted copy:

"If a municipality fails to submit the audited financial statements required under Section 14-1-208 of the 1976 Code to the State Treasurer within thirteen months of the end of their fiscal year, the State Treasurer must withhold all state payments to that municipality until the required audited financial statement is received."

Two further teeth in the same proviso:

  • If a submitted audit contains a significant finding related to court fine reports or remittances, the Treasurer follows Proviso 117.48 where an amount due is specified — otherwise the Treasurer withholds 25% of all state payments until the estimated deficiency is satisfied.
  • If a county or municipality is more than 90 days late on a monthly court fines report, the Treasurer withholds 25% of state funding until the reports are current.

In short: once a municipal audit is more than thirteen months late, the State Treasurer withholds all state payments to that municipality until the audit is received — with the separate 25% withholdings reserved for court-fine findings and late monthly court-fine reports.

For years these withholding penalties were suspended by budget language. That suspension was removed effective July 1, 2025 — which is why enforcement, and news coverage of it, picked up sharply in late 2025. The Town of Mayesville in Sumter County, for example, had more than $42,000 in state funds withheld while it worked to bring three years of audits current, according to reporting by The Sumter Item.

Small-town relief: the compilation option (Act 71 of 2023)

Municipalities whose prior-year total recurring revenue falls at or below a CPI-adjusted threshold — $500,000 for fiscal years beginning in calendar 2024, $514,748 for fiscal years beginning in calendar 2025 — may submit a compilation instead of a full audit: annually if the town operates a court, at least once every three years if it does not. Court-operating towns must still include the Uniform Supplemental Schedule and engage an accountant for agreed-upon procedures. For very small towns, this can cut compliance cost dramatically — and the statute lets a municipality recover up to $2,000 per year of the supplemental schedule cost from fines and assessments.

Sources: Proviso 98.9 and related statutes (Treasurer's posted PDF) · S.C. Code Title 14, Chapter 1 · STO Audit Information

If your municipality is on this list

Practical steps, in order:

  1. Confirm your actual status. Check the Treasurer's live list — it may lag your submission by weeks. Audits and compilations are submitted by email to annualaudits@sto.sc.gov.
  2. Check whether you qualify for a compilation. If prior-year recurring revenue was at or below the threshold ($514,748 for FY beginning in 2025), a compilation is faster and far cheaper than a full audit. The RFA threshold page has the current figure.
  3. Engage an auditor now, not at month 12. The deadline is 13 months after fiscal year end with no extensions. CPA firms that take on small-government work book up; being on this list makes you a harder engagement, not an easier one.
  4. Get your court fines schedule in order first. The Uniform Supplemental Schedule (court fines and assessments) is the piece the Treasurer scrutinizes — and the piece that triggers the 25% withholding if it produces a significant finding. Clean monthly remittance records make the audit itself faster.
  5. Tell your council what's being withheld. Withheld Local Government Fund and other state distributions are recoverable once the audit is filed — but only if someone is tracking what's owed and follows up after submission.
  6. Fix the underlying reporting process. Towns that land on this list once tend to return. The pattern is almost always the same: financial data lives in systems nobody reconciles monthly, so year-end becomes archaeology.

Where we fit in: the $4,500 Municipal Reporting Risk Assessment

Innovation Nexus is a municipal reporting consultancy in Florence, SC. Our Municipal Reporting Risk Assessment — $4,500, fixed fee, delivered in two weeks — reviews how your finance data gets from your systems (including Tyler Munis and EnerGov) into the reports your council and your auditor depend on, and hands you a prioritized fix list and a remediation roadmap. It is purely diagnostic — dashboards and rebuilt reports are separate engagements. It is not a financial statement audit and doesn't replace your CPA — it makes next year's audit faster and next month's council packet clearer.

Book the Risk Assessment

Related: Tyler Munis consultant in South Carolina · Munis year-end close help

Frequently asked questions

What happens if a city misses the audit deadline in South Carolina?

Under Proviso 98.9 of the FY2025-26 state budget, if a municipality fails to submit its audited financial statements to the State Treasurer within thirteen months of its fiscal year end, the State Treasurer must withhold all state payments to that municipality until the audit is received. This includes distributions such as the Local Government Fund. Withholding resumed July 1, 2025 after a period during which the penalty was suspended.

Can a town get an extension on its audit?

No — for municipalities, the Treasurer’s Office states it is not permitted to accept extensions. Counties may request a single extension of up to 90 days under S.C. Code § 4-9-150, signed by the council chair before the filing deadline.

Does a small town really need a full audit every year?

Not necessarily. Since Act 71 of 2023, a municipality with prior-year total recurring revenue at or below the state threshold ($514,748 for fiscal years beginning in calendar 2025) may file a compilation instead — annually if it has a municipal court, or at least once every three years if it doesn’t. Court-operating towns must still include the Uniform Supplemental Schedule of fines and assessments with agreed-upon procedures.

Is the withheld money lost forever?

No. Withheld state payments for a late audit are released once the required audited financial statement is received by the Treasurer. Separate 25% withholdings tied to court-fine deficiencies continue until the estimated deficiency is satisfied.

Does appearing on this list mean a town mismanaged money?

No. The list means one thing only: a required audit or compilation had not reached the State Treasurer as of the list’s update date. Most towns on the list are very small, and late audits usually trace to staff capacity, turnover, or difficulty engaging an auditor — not wrongdoing. Only an actual audit finding would indicate a financial problem.

How often is this tracker updated?

Monthly. We re-pull both Treasurer lists and note the Treasurer’s own “last updated” date on each. The official State Treasurer (STO) pages are always the authoritative record; if this page and the STO disagree, the STO is right.

Data source: SC Office of the State Treasurer, Municipal Delinquent Audits (updated July 24, 2026) and County Delinquent Audits (updated May 19, 2026), retrieved August 1, 2026. This tracker is refreshed monthly by Innovation Nexus LLC, Florence, SC. Corrections: contact us.